Tasnim Rida
  • Home
  • Projects
  • Resume

Social Rejection and Risk-Taking in Ingroup and Outgroup Situations

A behavioral study examining how social rejection influences risk-taking behavior across varying levels of rejection clarity and group identity.
Published

March 1, 2024

Social Rejection and Risk-Taking in Ingroup and Outgroup Situations

A behavioral study examining how social rejection influences risk-taking behavior across varying levels of rejection clarity and group identity.

March 2024
How does social rejection shape risk-taking behavior across ingroup and outgroup contexts?
Rejection conditions
Research Overview

This project investigates how experiences of social rejection influence individuals’ willingness to engage in risk-taking behavior. In particular, it examines how features of social experiences, including rejection clarity, explicit versus ambiguous, and group membership, ingroup versus outgroup, shape behavioral responses.

Methodology

The study employed a 2 × 2 between-subjects experimental design to examine how different social rejection contexts influence behavior and affect.

  • Group status was manipulated as ingroup versus outgroup.
  • Rejection clarity was manipulated as ambiguous versus explicit.
  • Social rejection was modeled using a modified Cyberball paradigm, an online ball-tossing game commonly used to study social exclusion.
  • Participants then completed a behavioral social risk-taking task and self-report measures assessing rumination, self-esteem, and negative affect.
Risk-taking results
Interaction effects
Key Findings
Manipulation Check

The experimental manipulation was successful, with participants in the explicit condition reporting significantly higher perceived rejection than those in the ambiguous condition.

Rejection Clarity Effects

While rejection clarity strongly shaped participants’ perception of exclusion, it did not translate into significant differences in social risk-taking or rumination.

Group Identity Effects

Rejection from ingroup versus outgroup members did not produce significant differences in social risk-taking or rumination, indicating that group membership alone was not a strong driver of behavioral response in this study.

Moderator Effect

A marginal effect suggested that individuals with moderate identity centrality may be more psychologically responsive, particularly in terms of rumination, when experiencing ambiguous rejection from ingroup members.

Research poster or presentation image

This research was conducted as part of Dr. Michael Trujillo’s Stigma, Health Equity, and Resilience Lab at Carnegie Mellon University. Findings were presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology 2024 Annual Convention and selected as the winning poster for CMU Psychology Department’s Meeting of the Minds 2024.